Definition: And Saul’s son had two men [that were] captains of bands: the name of the one [was] Baanah, and the name of the other Rechab, the sons of Rimmon a Beerothite, of the children of Benjamin: (for Beeroth also was reckoned to Benjamin:

Explanation: Okay, let's break down this verse from 2 Samuel 4:2. It’s a bit complex, but here’s a simple explanation: “And Saul’s son had two men [that were] captains of bands: the name of the one Baanah, and the name of the other Rechab, the sons of Rimmon a Beerothite, of the children of Benjamin: (for Beeroth also was reckoned to Benjamin:” Here's what it means in plain language: “And Saul’s son had two men [that were] captains of bands…” This tells us that we’re talking about a son of Saul, likely Saul himself. He had two leaders or commanders – “captains of bands.” This is important because it suggests he was leading a group of people. “The name of the one Baanah, and the name of the other Rechab…” These are the names of two specific men who were part of this leadership group. "Baanah" and "Rechab" are Hebrew names that translate roughly to “belonging to Saul” or “son of Saul.” “…the sons of Rimmon a Beerothite, of the children of Benjamin:” This is where it gets more complicated. “Rimmon a Beerothite” is a name – it’s a specific family name. And "children of Benjamin" refers to a line of people who descended from Jacob (Israel’s father). This means these two men are part of the lineage that went back to Jacob and his descendants. Putting it all together: Saul's son had two leaders – two men named Baanah and Rechab – who were part of a group led by Rimmon a Beerothite, and they descended from the children of Benjamin. Essentially, this is a description of Saul’s family history and lineage that was connected to the people he ruled. Context - Why is this important? This verse is significant because it reveals a pattern in Saul's leadership: He frequently had two leaders who were related to his family line – meaning he had a strong connection to his ancestry. This suggests a potential issue with his rule, as it meant he was relying on multiple people to lead and make decisions. --- Do you want me to: Explain any of these parts in more detail? Connect this verse to a larger story or theme in the Bible?